Simple Diet Diary Data Add-on
Simple Diet Diary Data Add-on
The official app & game
Distributed by UptoPlay
SCREENSHOTS
DESCRIPTION
Use UptoPlay to play online the game Simple Diet Diary Data Add-on.
NOTE: This is an add-on for Simple Diet Diary and does nothing on its own. The main app can be found here if you don't have it already:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rarepebble.dietdiary
Enjoy with UptoPlay the online game Simple Diet Diary Data Add-on.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Developer: Martin Stone
Genre: Health & Fitness
App version: 1.2.0
App size: 1.5M
Recent changes: Removed requirement for read permission. (Fixes install errors on some devices).
Comments:
It's helpful for basic foods like rice and fruit but most branded foods on the database are American.
I am having problem getting it to connect to the app
Fantastic Martin, thank you for adding this. My only suggestion would be to \n' +
make it more obvious that it exists. I could have used this so long ago but \n' +
I just now realized that it exists!
This is a database of foods that makes it easy to enter items into Simple Diet Diary, It contains calorie counts that autofill. Like most such databases, it has a lot of items you wish weren't there and is missing some you wish were. But it's easy to modify or add new items and these appear on the autosuggest list. It's also easy to modify portions and calorie counts. This is a highly-useful -- I'd even say essential -- add on to the Simple Diet Diary app, If your main goal is counting calories, this will do the job.
My main app does not seem to recognize its presence. EDIT after reply from the developer: The search button does invoke the plug-in. Upgraded to three stars to reflect my neutral opinion (so far) on the usefulness of the data itself. I installed the main app and the plug-in at the same time, and I just assumed the search button was a generic search of my entered data (which, in retrospect, would be duplicative, given the behavior of the name field). The use of a generic search icon made the plug-in TOO unobtrusive, and it was not obvious to me that the two were connected, though it makes sense after you point it out. Perhaps I failed to RTFM somewhere along the way. :) I have not tested the content of the plug-in to determine its usefulness for my situation.'
Page navigation: